In 1885, a pamphlet went on sale in Lynchburg, Virginia, for fifty cents. It contained three pages of numbers, a long explanatory story, and a claim: that the numbers encoded the location of a buried treasure in iron pots somewhere in Bedford County, along with a list of the people it belonged to.
One of the three ciphers had already been solved. It described the treasure in detail. The other two — the ones giving the actual location and the names of the owners — have resisted every attempt at decryption since. Cryptographers, treasure hunters, computer scientists and at least one former National Security Agency employee have attacked them. Bedford County has been dug up repeatedly.
The Beale ciphers are either one of the most tantalising unsolved puzzles in cryptographic history or one of the most successful literary hoaxes of the nineteenth century. Both positions have serious defenders.
The story as told
According to the pamphlet, in January 1820 a man named Thomas J. Beale checked into the Washington Hotel in Lynchburg, run by Robert Morriss. Beale stayed the winter, made an impression as a striking and well-liked guest, and left in the spring.
He returned two years later, stayed again, and on departing left Morriss a locked iron box, asking him to keep it safe. A letter arrived some months afterwards from St. Louis, explaining that the box contained papers that would be unintelligible without a key, and that the key had been left with a friend who would forward it to Morriss in June 1832. Beale then vanished from the record entirely.
The key never came. Morriss waited, by his own account, twenty-three years before opening the box in 1845. Inside were two plaintext letters explaining the background, and three sheets covered in numbers.
The letters described how Beale and a party of around thirty men had gone west in 1817, and while hunting in what is now Colorado had discovered gold and silver. They mined it over several years, converted some to jewels, and transported it east in two shipments to be buried in a vault in Bedford County. The ciphers, Beale wrote, gave the location, the contents, and the names of the party's members and their next of kin.
Morriss, unable to crack them, passed the papers to an unnamed friend shortly before his death. That friend spent years on the problem, solved the second cipher, failed with the others, and — having by his own admission wrecked his finances and neglected his family in the attempt — published the pamphlet to share the burden and recoup his losses.
How the second cipher was solved
The second sheet was encoded with a **book cipher**. In this method, each number refers to a word in an agreed text, and the cipher letter is the first letter of that word. Number 74 means "take the 74th word of the key text and use its first letter."
The key text turned out to be the United States Declaration of Independence.
Decoded, it reads in part:
> "I have deposited in the county of Bedford, about four miles from Buford's, in an excavation or vault, six feet below the surface of the ground, the following articles, belonging jointly to the parties whose names are given in number three, herewith..."
It goes on to enumerate the contents: roughly 2,921 pounds of gold, 5,100 pounds of silver, and jewels acquired in St. Louis to reduce bulk in transport. At modern precious metal prices, the metals alone would be worth tens of millions of dollars.
The decryption is not perfect. It contains several errors, apparently arising because whoever numbered the Declaration's words made mistakes, and because some letters are represented by words that do not begin with the intended letter. Those imperfections are themselves a point of argument — some see them as evidence of authentic amateur work, others as clumsiness in a fabrication.
Why the others resist
Cipher one supposedly gives the vault's location; cipher three lists the owners' names and relatives.
The obvious first move — trying the Declaration of Independence on them — produces gibberish. So the ciphers presumably use different key texts, and the space of candidate texts is effectively unbounded. Analysts have tried the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Magna Carta, the Louisiana Purchase, Shakespeare, the Bible, contemporary almanacs and hundreds of other documents. Nothing has produced sustained readable output.
There are curiosities. Applying the Declaration to cipher one yields, at certain points, brief strings that look almost like words — sequences such as "ABFDEFGHIIJKLMMNOHPP" appear, an alphabet-like run that is very unlikely to occur by chance. Some researchers read this as evidence of a deliberate embedded pattern, or of a related-but-modified key. Others read it as a sign the numbers were generated with some structure but no genuine message.
Statistical analysis has been applied extensively. The number distributions in ciphers one and three differ from cipher two in ways that some analysts consider suspicious, and cipher three appears too short to encode thirty names plus next of kin at the letters-per-number rate seen in cipher two.
The case for a hoax
Sceptics have assembled a substantial argument.
**The language.** Analysis of the pamphlet's plaintext letters, attributed to Beale, found stylistic similarities to the pamphlet's own narrative voice, and usage of several words that were rare or not yet current in 1822 — "stampede" being the most cited example.
**The convenient absences.** No independent record of Thomas J. Beale has ever been firmly established. The original papers, the iron box, and the letters are all gone. The pamphlet's author is anonymous. Every verifiable thread terminates.
**The structure of the story.** A solved cipher that proves treasure exists but not where it is, and two unsolved ones that would tell you — this is close to the ideal design for selling pamphlets. The one that was cracked functions precisely as an advertisement.
**The Declaration itself.** As a key text it is a notably American, notably obvious choice, well suited to a patriotic nineteenth-century readership.
**The absent scale.** Moving several tons of precious metal across the continent by wagon in the 1820s, twice, with a party of thirty men, is a substantial undertaking that left no trace in any other record.
The strongest hoax hypothesis holds that the pamphlet was written and sold as a money-making scheme, possibly by James B. Ward, the man who registered its copyright, or by an associate.
The case for authenticity
Defenders counter on several points.
Cipher two is genuinely and correctly decodable, which required real cryptographic construction. A hoaxer would have had to encode a complete plausible message by hand against a numbered text — laborious, though hardly impossible.
The remaining ciphers contain statistical structure that some analysts argue is inconsistent with random numbers. If a hoaxer produced them, they went to considerable trouble to make unsolvable ciphers look solvable.
And there is the general observation that historical record-keeping in early nineteenth-century frontier America was patchy. Absence of documentation for a private individual is weak evidence either way.
The digging
Bedford County has endured generations of treasure hunters. Landowners have found their fields excavated without permission. At least one group obtained legal permission to search a cemetery. Metal detectors, ground-penetrating radar, and a great deal of unauthorised shovel work have all been deployed.
Nothing has been found. Nothing that anyone has reported, at least — which is itself an argument treasure hunters occasionally make, and an unfalsifiable one.
Summary
Three ciphers, one solved with the Declaration of Independence describing a fortune in gold and silver, two unsolved that would reveal where it is and who it belongs to. Every physical artefact has vanished, no independent record of Thomas Beale has surfaced, and the linguistic evidence leans towards fabrication. But cipher two really does decode, and the other two really have defeated two centuries of serious effort. The puzzle survives because it is exactly hard enough to be worth attempting and exactly obscure enough that nobody can prove it is empty.
Be the first to share a thought.